|
Workplace points of view
This section presents papers and ideas about
some relevant accommodation-related issues. It provides various
points
of view to give you some background information on the following
topics:
Click on the titles or introductions to access
copies of each of the papers in the following sections.
Enclosed offices or open plan?
| FACT
1 |
Most
people want their own office |
| FACT
2 |
Most
people work hard to get their own office and see it as a status
symbol within their organisation (after all most bosses have
offices) |
| FACT
3 |
Most
designers and workplace planners work hard to get the majority
of people to move out of offices and work in "open plan" |
WHY?
The open vs closed office debate is probably
one of the most topical and controversial issues in office design
of recent times. Franklin Becker PhD and William Sims PhD looked
at this issue in some detail in their article titled "Offices
that Work" which was produced as part of the International
Workplace Studies Program (IWSP) at Cornell University. The
University also
has numerous other interesting articles about workplace issues
available from its IWSP page at http://iwsp.human.cornell.edu.
The general consensus these days is that
offices should only be provided where there is a proven need to
have one. Most workplaces will comprise a mix of open and closed
planning but the more we can minimise the closed component the more
we increase flexibility and the social interaction required in today's
working environment.
Office Sharing
In "Offices that Work" Becker and Sims also look
at the concept of office sharing. They say, "The case against enclosed
offices sooner or later gets around to the 'sterility' of working
alone. But enclosed offices need not be one-person offices. The
two-or-three-or four-person offices make a lot of sense, particularly,
if office groupings can be made to align with work groups."
To
read the full article click here
Checklist for 'Reinventing the Workplace'
In the work that DEGW has carried out with Steelecase
Corporation a simple checklist was developed and this has been included
as a guide for anyone embarking on a project that is seeking to
'reinvent the workplace'. To
read the full article click here
Implications of Churn
"Churn" is defined as "Internal accommodation
re-arrangements undertaken in response to changing organisational
and functional requirements" 1
In 2002, the Facility Management Association
of Australia (FMA) completed a research project titled, FMA Office
Churn Research - The Management of Physical Workplace Change. An
excerpt from the report describing the different types of churn
and associated costs can be viewed here. More detailed information
about this project can be obtained from the FMA
Publications and Research page.
Alternative Ways of Working
In many companies, a creative response to continuing
trends in organisation and business change, has been the development
of a set of strategies called Alternative Workplace Strategies
(AWS) or Alternative Ways of Working (AWW) or Alternative Officing
or New Officing.
"New Officing's goal is to use workplaces, technologies,
and work processes in an integrated system of enablers … to work
smarter … and wherever work happens." As Michael Brill says in "Disproving
Widespread Myths about Workplace Design" New Officing is based on
three basic strategies:
- Radical re-design - its
premise is that, given the trend-driven changes in work, traditional
workplace design and use have diminishing value, and a more radical
approach to workplace design and its management MAY yield real
benefit. It often involves a discarding of old workplace standards
and developing of new ones based on rigorous analysis of the business
and the work.
- Work from anywhere … where the office
is not the major site for work. This may include:
- Working from or at home
- Working at clients' sites
- Satellite work sites
- Virtual work in hotels, airports, etc.
- Hotelling - where the office is still
the base for work, but much of it happens elsewhere. Essentially
this strategy runs the office like a "hotel" where people are
generally out of the workplace a lot (generally 60% or more) and
share a set of reservable but non-dedicated spaces.
 |
A glossary of AWS terms identifying advantages,
disadvantages and particular issues attached to their application
is available by clicking
here.
These ideas need careful business analysis
and organisational planning before they are implemented. This is
reinforced in a case study titled Addressing Change Through Alternative
Workplace Strategies by Paul Heath and Lee Thorn-Silverton (Published
in FM Journal May/June 1997) which utilises Citicorp's Alternative
Workplace Strategies Initiative to address potential AWS characteristics;
"rollout" options, support system organisational changes, implementation
approaches and lessons learnt.
Density Benchmarking
The density issue is always contentious and organisations
seek to find ways of benchmarking their space against others, but
is density really a good measure of workplace efficiency?
While some regard must be had to the use of space,
the most important aspect of workplace design is functional efficiency.
Low workspace ratios are more an indicator of efficient design than
workplace efficiency. Nevertheless, comparison of workplace densities
remains a valid benchmarking exercise so long as it is used to reflect
effective use of space and not workplace efficiency.
The following table depicts office space densities
in major cities in Australia and overseas. It is an excerpt from
an article in the Sydney Morning Herald on 18 February 2003 titled
"Office workers feel the squeeze as costs are cut." which details
a research study conducted by DTZ
Research. The full report is available from the DTZ Research
website.
|
Country
|
Workspace
per employee (sqm)
|
Country
|
Workspace
per employee (sqm)
|
| Australia |
-
|
New
Zealand |
-
|
| Adelaide |
19
|
Auckland |
18.5
|
| Brisbane |
17
|
Wellington |
18
|
| Canberra |
19
|
Germany |
-
|
| Melbourne |
16
|
Berlin |
22.5
|
| Perth |
18
|
Frankfurt |
22.5
|
| Sydney |
16
|
France |
-
|
| China |
-
|
Paris |
17
|
| Beijing |
10
|
Denmark |
-
|
| Shanghai |
10.5
|
Brussels |
19
|
| Italy |
-
|
Saudi
Arabia |
-
|
| Milan |
14
|
Riyadh |
15
|
| Rome |
14.5
|
Brazil |
-
|
| Russia |
-
|
Sao Paulo |
21.4
|
| Moscow |
15
|
United
Kingdom |
-
|
| Japan |
-
|
London (city) |
10.5
|
| Tokyo |
11.6
|
Manchester |
11.5
|
| Poland |
-
|
Edinburgh |
11.5
|
| Warsaw |
11
|
USA |
-
|
| Norway |
-
|
Washington DC |
22.1
|
| Oslo |
25
|
New York |
20.9
|
| - |
-
|
Los Angeles |
22.1
|
| - |
-
|
Chicago |
20.7
|
What is Workplace Change Management?
What is workplace change management (WCM) and
why does change not always deliver on its original promise?
The term WCM describes
the generic process of managing an organisation's implementation
of key changes or projects, typically to improve business performance,
within the workplace. The focus of WCM
is
very much on people and the transition involved for them through
anticipating and experiencing change.
"Focusing on people in this way recognises the
key role that staff have in making the desired outcome actually
work to its full potential, and it maximises the organisations investment
in whatever change is procured." 2
Effective WCM is typically delivered through a
structured program of communication and support activities. This
approach allows staff to become aware, involved and engaged in the
change process and concentrates on adequately and timely informing,
preparing and supporting staff before, during and after the project
or change has been implemented.
Accessing a broad range of staff helps to manage
their expectations, respond to expressed concerns and support them
through the period of real adjustment. The most obvious objective
of WCM is to secure staff commitment to the desired change and more
importantly to take ownership and guardianship of the change into
the future.
Yet, "research indicates that 50 to 80% of large
systems implementations, organisational re-engineering and change
efforts fail to deliver the promised benefits." 3
Why does change efforts appear to fail as often as they succeed?
More importantly how can we increase our chances of making workplace
changes sustainable?
The generally held view that consultation and
participation techniques aimed to engage the workforce, associated
with change initiatives has certainly been a radical improvement
on past techniques. Fundamentally staff involvement and consultation
"must ring true". In other words if staff are actively involved,
then they will automatically "take on" and "own" the proposed changes.
"Despite the best efforts of the promoters of
change, a considerable number of change programs still fail because
they lose support from the rest of the business. This is particularly
true in property and facility management. Accommodation issues often
become a distraction in the midst of senior management crises, external
market shifts, sudden changes in technology and changes in personnel."
4
Records and Document Management
Efficient records and document management can
significantly reduce your total space requirements.
"Relocation provides an organisation with a unique
opportunity to ensure that paper and electronic records are in the
most efficient format, allowing that organisation to relocate efficiently,
utilising a minimum of storage but with a compliant document management
system.
The need to introduce improved Electronic Document
Management (EDM) has become universally accepted to accord with
Privacy and other Acts. There is of course a substantial cost in
achieving EDM but current figures indicate payback being achieved
after 3 years. The successful introduction of EDM can reduce paper
storage requirements by 70-80% and substantially value adds in the
creation of procedural efficiencies." (Excerpt from MoveCorp Australia
Pty Ltd - Summary of Capabilities)
Distribution of Support Spaces
"Densities can range from 8m2 per person to 25m2
per person, but what space is made up of and how it is used is the
real test and indication of success for a workplace."5
Generally we observe a redistribution of space
in contemporary workplaces, as we strive to achieve a stronger alignment
between workplace and organisation direction.
If we think of the three categories of space
being based on:
- Homebases - Offices and
Workstations (homebases)
- Group/Support Spaces (ancillary)
- Circulation
The following table indicates the % space break-ups
that have been achieved in some Australian and overseas examples.
| Organisation |
Homebases |
Group/
Support |
Circulation |
| Large
Retail HQ, England |
55% |
25% |
20% |
| Financial
Office, Sydney |
50% |
30% |
20% |
| Bank
HQ, Sydney |
61% |
23% |
16% |
| Project
Managers, Sydney |
47% |
34% |
19% |
| Consultancy
Global |
43% |
40% |
17% |
| Technology,
England |
37% |
45% |
18% |
| Technology,
Sweden |
36% |
31% |
33% |
|
|